Quinn Gleason vs Fatma Al Nabhani Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Gleason 1 - 0 Nabhani

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gleason has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nabhani has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gleason, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nabhani has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Gleason has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nabhani has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Gleason has won 25% of matches played (W/L 2/ 6), with Nabhani winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 82/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Nabhani has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 81/ 62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
• Player level: In the last year, Gleason has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Nabhani has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gleason winning 1 times and Nabhani being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gleason winning 2 and Nabhani winning 0. The last match between Gleason and Nabhani was at the W60 Honolulu, 10-07-2019, First, Hard with Quinn Gleason getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Gleason and Nabhani have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gleason winning 0 times and Nabhani 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gleason winning 0, and Nabhani 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gleason has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.88 while Nabhani has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gleason has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nabhani has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Gleason has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nabhani has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)